CSC 153: Computer Science Fundamentals | Grinnell College | Spring, 2005 |
Laboratory Exercise Reading | ||
Since procedures are considered just another data type in Scheme, Scheme allows procedures to return new procedures. Procedures that return procedures are sometimes called higher-order procedures. One common use of these higher-order procedures is to define general templates for processing. Filling in a template then gives a procedure to perform a specific task.
For example, a higher-order procedure general-sort could provide a general template for sorting any type of data in any order. We then could use the template for defining specific sorting procedures. Here is a possible interaction:
(define general-sort (lambda (order-predicate) ... ) ) (define sort-numbers-ascending (general-sort <=)) (define sort-numbers-descending (general-sort >=)) (define sort-strings-ascending (general-sort string<=?)) (sort-numbers-ascending '(3 1 4 1 5 9 2)) ==> (1 1 2 3 4 5 9) (sort-numbers-descending '(3 1 4 1 5 9 2)) ==> (9 5 4 3 2 1 1) (sort-strings-ascending '("an" "the" "a") ==> ("a" "an" "the")
While the details of general-sort need to be filled in, the idea is that we can use that template for sorting any data by giving the appropriate predicate for determining when one item comes before another.
This reading supplies background for writing such templates.
One kind of flexibility that Scheme programmers get from having procedures
as values is the ability to fill in different arguments of a multi-argument
procedure at different points in the computation. For example, consider
the following substitute
procedure, which takes three
arguments -- old-lst
, which should be a list, and
old
and new
, which might be values of any type --
and returns a list just like old-lst
except that
new
has been substituted for every element of
old-lst
that is equal to old
(as determined by
the equal?
predicate):
(define substitute (lambda (old-lst old new) ;; precondition test (if (not (list? old-lst)) (error 'substitute "The first parameter must be a list")) (let kernel ((rest old-lst) (result '())) (if (null? rest) (reverse result) ;; Reverse the final list, because the ;; recursion builds it back to front. (let ((first (car rest))) (kernel (cdr rest) (cons (if (equal? old first) new first) result)))))))
In many cases where this procedure might be applied, the values of
old
and new
are obtained before the value of
old-lst
is even considered. One might, therefore, want to
write a procedure that takes just old
and new
as
arguments and returns a procedure that waits for the initial list:
(define sub (lambda (old new) (lambda (old-lst) (substitute old-lst old new))))
Now a definition like
(define year-replacer (sub 'year 1997))
makes year-replacer
a substitution procedure that performs one
specific substitution on any initial list:
> (year-replacer '(ear here year sheer year year beer tier here)) (ear here 1997 sheer 1997 1997 beer tier here) > (year-replacer '(year month day)) (1997 month day) > (year-replacer '(no replacement here)) (no replacement here)
A procedure that is derived from another procedure by filling in some but not all of its arguments is called an "operator section." You don't need the "procedures as values" idea to create individual operator sections, if you know the values that you want to fill in when you're writing the program. A procedure as simple as
(define double (lambda (n) (* n 2)))
qualifies as an operator section, since it fills in the second argument to
the *
procedure with a particular value. The extra power that
you get in Scheme is the ability to generalize the process of
constructing operator sections, as in the sub
procedure, which
actually builds and returns a new operator section during the execution of
the program. The programmer may not even know what will be substituted for
what at run time (the values of the parameters old
and
new
might, for instance, be read in from a file that is
prepared long after the program is written and compiled); she can
nevertheless direct the construction and use of an appropriate operator
section without revising the program in any way.
To curry a procedure that has two or more arguments is to rewrite it, repeatedly using this mechanism for operator sectioning, so that each of its arguments is supplied separately:
(define curried-substitute (lambda (template) (lambda (old) (lambda (new) (substitute template old new))))) > (((curried-substitute '(a b c b d b e)) 'b) 'f) (a f c f d f e)
In other words: Applying the curried-substitute
procedure to
the list (a b c b d b e)
yields a procedure which, when
applied to the symbol b
, yields another procedure which, when
applied to the symbol f
, finally returns the result list
(a f c f d f e)
. Either of the intermediate procedures could
easily be split out and given a name:
(define new-for-old (curried-substitute '(a b c b d b e))) > ((new-for-old 'b) 'f) (a f c f d f e) (define new-for-b (new-for-old 'b)) > (new-for-b 'f) (a f c f d f e)
One way of looking at this is to think of the intermediate procedures as
being used for data storage: new-for-old
is "remembering"
the value of the filled-in parameter template
, and
new-for-b
is remembering both the value of
template
and the value of old
, so that the only
parameter that remains to be supplied in the last call is new
.
This process of writing a procedure that returns a procedure is called currying -- named after the logician Haskell B. Curry.
The reading on the insertion sort showed how a procedure could be defined that returns a list of numbers in ascending order. In that lab, an ordering predicate (e.g., <= or =>) is used to compare specific data, but all of the rest of the code is independent of the type of data and the nature of the ordering required.
The same idea of currying can be applied to produce a proceduregeneral-sort
that takes an ordering predicate (e.g., <= or =>)
as parameter and that returns a sorting procedure based on that predicate.
Thus, an alternative definition of sort-numbers-ascending
might be:
(define sort-numbers-ascending (general-sort <=))
while a procedure for sorting list elements in descending order might be:
(define sort-numbers-descending (general-sort >=))
A compose
procedure may be defined that takes any two
procedures f
and g
of arity 1 as arguments and
returns a single procedure that is a composite of the two, in the sense
that the value it returns can be obtained by applying g
to its
argument and then f
to g
's result.
(define compose (lambda (f g) (lambda (x) (f (g x)))))
This document is available on the World Wide Web as
http://www.walker.cs.grinnell.edu/courses/153.sp05/readings/reading-higher-order-proc.shtml
Henry M. Walker (walker@cs.grinnell.edu)
created April 2, 1997 by John David Stone last revised February 3, 2005 by Henry M. Walker |
![]() ![]() |
For more information, please contact Henry M. Walker at walker@cs.grinnell.edu. |