Writing in the Tutorial
One vital objective of each tutorial is "To give special attention to
writing and critical analysis". Thus, work for this tutorial includes
several short research exercises, four papers, and an exercise on
quotation, paraphrasing, and citation. While the research exercises will
be distributed in class, the following describes the academic honesty
exercise and the paper assignments in more detail. In each case, these
exercises relate directly to material discussed in class.
Details on the various writing activities will appear in the next couple
weeks.
Exercise | Title and Description |
Academic Honesty Exercise
| Practices for Quotation, Paraphrase, and
Attribution
|
| - Paraphrase, Quoted Snippets, Long quotation
- Use of quote to make another point
|
Paper 1
| Ethical Decision Making and e-Voting
| Due Tuesday, October 10
|
|
- Give an example involving the need to
make an ethical decision involving computing, or
- outline a case study related to the use
of electronic voting technology
|
Paper 2
| Describe an Application of Artificial
Intelligence
| Due Tuesday, October 31 (Report topic by
Thursday, October 26)
|
|
- Library Research to find information on a
specific expert system, neural
network, or other application
- Identification of approach and main points
|
Paper 3
| Parallel algorithms or Risks of Computing
| Due Tuesday, November 14 (Report topic by
Tuesday, November 7)
|
|
- Describe a specific parallel algorithm, or
- Identify several risks of computing
|
Paper 4
| Library Research and Report
| Draft Due Thursday, December 7
|
|
- Draft for peer review
- Paper revision
- Oral presentation
|
Some Notes on Writing Papers
-
Use an idea as the basis for an effective paper.
-
You must have something to say.
-
This requires adequate research/background.
-
You need to have thought about the topic, but
the idea need not be earthshaking.
-
Just find an idea you find interesting.
-
Pay attention to the appearance of your paper;
while a nice appearances does not guarantee a good grade, a sloppy
paper is likely to receive a lower grade.
-
Spelling/punctuation/grammar errors undermine your credibility.
-
Even worse, sloppiness suggests you don't care, so why should the reader?
-
On the other side, a paper that looks nice sends the message
that you care and are interested.
-
Calvin of "Calvin and Hobbes" once said that a clear plastic binder would
guarantee him a good grade. While this is overstated, do not dismiss this
out of hand.
-
All this suggests that
-
use of a spelling checker should be considered mandatory, and
-
proofreading a paper a few times is essential.
-
Spend enough time organizing, writing, editing, and polishing your ideas.
-
A paper is the only evidence the reader has on how much you have done.
-
20-30 hours of research and thought cannot be explained by writing for only an
hour or two.
-
At the other extreme, people vote for politicians with smooth speeches,
even if there is little content.
-
Even faculty may not be immune from the lure of polished writing.
-
Write your introduction (e.g., the introductory paragraph) to identify the
topic, place the topic in a context, and indicate the structure of the paper.
-
Place the topic in context, but do not over-generalize.
-
State your thesis clearly and concisely.
-
Since the rest of your paper explains and justifies your thesis, the
introduction should indicate how the following explanation or logical
argument is organized.
-
Structure your argument, so that each paragraph has a unifying theme.
-
Each paragraph should contain a clearly stated, topic sentence.
-
All other components of the paragraph should related directly to that
theme.
-
Think about each topic enough, so you have something to say. A paragraph
with only two or three sentences often indicates the author should think
more deeply about the topic.
-
Structure your sentences to make your point clearly, concisely, and
forcefully.
-
State what you mean directly. (Using words in "quotes" often indicates a
lack of clarity -- use the words you mean.)
-
State your ideas completely, but do not repeat over and over and over
again.
-
Use active verbs whenever possible to propel the reader forward. Sentences
often can be tightened if they are rewritten to replace passive verbs and
linking verbs with active ones.
In short, both form and substance are needed for good reviews or a good
grade. One is unlikely to do well with all form with no substance, but
success is equally unlikely with substance but poor form. Often there is
tendency to shortchange the importance of form, but this rarely produces
strong results.
Helpful Hint: For many scholars, the combination of substance
and form requires at least two steps:
-
A draft is written with the desired content given in considerable detail.
Often this draft is 1.5 to 2 times the desired length for the finished
paper.
-
Edit the draft repeatedly to tighten the prose, reducing redundancy,
strengthening sentences, clarifying wording, and perhaps even adding
newly identified examples or details.
In this process, step A focuses on content, and the author takes care
to include as much material as possible. Step B then polishes the
presentation. In cases when the first draft is significantly longer
than the desired final product, Step B provides a mechanism to
improve the clarity, forcefulness, and flow of the presentation.
This document is available on the World Wide Web as
http://www.walker.cs.grinnell.edu/courses/tutorial.fa06/writing/